Wednesday, July 20, 2005

Dragon Lady is Mad

Ann Coulter is mad! MAD! MAD! MAD! Over John Robert's nomination. Is this a cheap trick to confuse liberals? Probably not:
It means nothing that Roberts wrote briefs arguing for the repeal of Roe v. Wade when he worked for Republican administrations. He was arguing on behalf of his client, the United States of America. Roberts has specifically disassociated himself from those cases, dropping a footnote to a 1994 law review article that said:

“In the interest of full disclosure, the author would like to point out that as Deputy Solicitor General for a portion of the 1992-93 Term, he was involved in many of the cases discussed below. In the interest of even fuller disclosure, he would also like to point out that his views as a commentator on those cases do not necessarily reflect his views as an advocate for his former client, the United States.”

Though, she did make me laugh (that bitch!):
It means absolutely nothing that NARAL and Planned Parenthood attack him: They also attacked Sandra Day O’Connor, Anthony Kennedy and David Hackett Souter.

The only way a supreme court nominee could win the approval of NARAL and Planned Parenthood would be to actually perform an abortion during his confirmation hearing, live, on camera, and preferably a partial birth one.

And Ann, what would make you happy? If he started stuffing unwanted frozen embryos into women like sandwich meat on the Senate floor? That would end the stem cell debate.

No comments: